baldinbusiness

weight lifter with head down

Embrace the Pain

I had a recent conversation with my trainer, Jimmy, about the counter-intuitive nature of bodybuilding. He was challenging me prior to one of our last sets of the session, “your body is going to be screaming ‘go faster’ and burn through this set, I want you to overpower your natural emotions and continue to work the muscle in the way this exercise intends to.”

Halfway through the set —it was excruciating —I was reminded that this advice pertains to all areas of life, business especially.

As I frequently write and talk about, organizational life is reactionary these days. Everyone is on the run, everyone is busy, and there is little time to spare. Organizationally, “pounding through the last set,” is sending a reply-all to the 33rd email in the chain (that sort of thing never happens at Hoffer Plastics…), rather than having a one-on-one conversation with the main person you need to connect with. It is assuming the worst when your team member writes or says something–again in email–that can easily be misconstrued, and venting to all the other team members without having a crucial conversation with the person who said it. It is “taking the issue off-line,” getting 38 people around the table (okay 38 is a little bit of an exaggeration but you get the idea) and everyone throwing logs on to the fire without anyone actually stepping up to be accountable for resolution. It is the sense that a lot was just discussed, and “we have a plan,” but three days later that “plan” hasn’t even left the gate for take-off because nobody is captaining the plane.

The examples are endless. They’re all hurried, sloppy, and not efficient in the long run, just like sloppy workouts are.

“Everyone is busy” is often the excuse, isn’t it? But isn’t the real reason that we lack discipline? Slowing down, properly trouble-shooting an issue, and deciding who is accountable, often brings with it the “lactic acid” that a burn-out set does. There is burning and pain, but in the end there is also progress.

This kind of execution and efficiency is counter-intuitive. If it was not, more organizations would be wildly successful.

Doing things the right way is never easy.

As I have said before, often the best decision or strategy is on the other side of your comfort zone. In a world of constant virtual connectivity, slowing down and aligning with fellow human beings is anything but comfortable.

(On that note, if you are reading this Jimmy, I don’t pay you to go light. If it does not suck, we are not doing it. See you tomorrow at 6 a.m.).

And since training fires me up, I’ll end with the question I ask myself every Friday morning when I am driving down Randall Road in the pitch black of the early morning:

How bad do you want it?

I have to ask this question because I am always tired, and it’s always tempting to take the easy way out.

If you want your organization to be mediocre, you don’t have to do embrace the pain.

You can even sleep in.

If you want to improve, however, you have to embrace the counter-intuitive nature of slowing down and acting with discipline.

You have to rise and go.

Embrace the Pain Read More »

basketball player shooting

Why the Chicago Bulls Won Six Titles

I am from Chicago and grew up in the 1980’s and 1990’s. So, I know more about Michael Jordan, and the Chicago Bulls’ glory years of the 1990’s than I’d like to admit. The championships, celebrations, and fun accompanying them, still reverberate in my mind all these years later.

What made the Chicago Bulls great? The easy answer is Michael Jordan, arguably the greatest basketball player in the history of the National Basketball Association. But this answer is too simplistic, and misses something that was much discussed during the Bulls heyday: the importance of role players.

The day was June 14, 1992. The Bulls were leading the Portland Trailblazers 3 games to 2 in their best of 7 NBA Finals Series. Playing on their home court, the Bulls were in position to win their second NBA Championship in a row. But trailing by 17 points in the fourth quarter, the game looked lost. Both Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen —an all-time great in his own right —were on the bench, and what happened next is legendary for Chicago Bulls fans: Bobby Hansen hit a three-point field goal—his only points of the entire game—that sparked a furious rally by players coming off the Bulls’ bench. These guys were not stars, but rather, role players. They knew, and accepted their roles on the team, and played them with humility and gave everything they had on the court. And before the afternoon was over, with both MJ and Scottie dominating the game down the stretch, the Chicago Bulls were NBA Champions again, winning the game 97-93.

When I mention Bobby Hansen to fellow Bulls fans, they always remember the play I refer to above. Moreso, they can name role players like Steve Kerr, Bill Wennington, and Jud Buechler from later Championship teams. These players taught us that playing a role on the team was vital to a team’s ultimate success. As the Bulls’ Head Coach Phil Jackson would remind us regularly in TV interviews, the team succeeded when Michael “let the game come to him,” and kept his “teammates involved.”  This created chemistry, and the “Zen”  Jackson desired for the team.  It all worked because Michael played his role, that of the superstar, and the role players played theirs. 

And each needed the other.

A comment I heard Adam Grant make recently on the EntreLeadership Podcast got me thinking about how the Bulls were able to mix role players with superstars. Grant says, “If you only hire ‘A’ players, then you probably have a ‘B’ team.”   Leaders tend to spend a lot of their energy, however, on hiring “A” players.  We read books, attend seminars, and create hiring strategies around hiring “A” players because we know that we need some “A” players to win (The Chicago

Bulls were pathetic both before and after Michael Jordan!). Yet, as Grant reminds us, hiring “A” all players won’t ensure success.  Rather, like the Chicago Bulls, we need to fill out our roster with role players so that every role is filled.

In practice, this might mean that a sales leader seeks a solid “account manager,” rather than seeking another “business development manager.”  This is subtle, but one role demands relational and support skills, while the other demands a lot of self-confidence and drive usually associated with an “A” player.  Organizations need both to thrive, so it is up to the leader to decipher which skill set they need in a given context.

The challenge with this post is simple: ask yourself what kind of role are you missing on your team right now?  Driving to specificity here makes all the difference.

You might discover that you are not missing a superstar, but rather a “Bobby Hansen.”

And fulfilling this role might similarly make all the difference to your team’s ultimate success!

Why the Chicago Bulls Won Six Titles Read More »

dog with tongue out in child swing

Make the Choice

Occasionally, I get some candid feedback about this blog. Recently, someone told me, “Some of your blog posts are good, others are not so much.”

This is not the only time I have heard someone say that. (And let’s be honest, it probably is an accurate assessment!)

The choice —and even if you are not publishing a blog for the world to see, you still have this choice —is whether or not you are going to let feedback like this slow you down.

Haters will aways hate.

Creators will always create.

It is your choice.

I’m posting this, so I have already made mine.

Make the Choice Read More »

Sensing Something? Just Ask.

If your intuition is that what you’re doing —whatever it may be —is making someone upset, why don’t you simply ask:

Is what I am doing making you upset?

I recently asked this question to one of my direct reports who is a manager within the company. I had previously set up meetings with their team members (without the manager present) in hopes of establishing personal relationships with them —a goal of mine is to be accessible to the whole organization.  The manager knew about the meetings and was, at least initially, all right with the idea.  My intention was to create trust and demonstrate that I could hear difficult feedback from these individuals —even if it was about their “manager”—and maintain confidentiality. I also wanted to be cognizant of the amount of the meetings the “manager” already had and not add to that list.

As time went by, however, I could tell that the meetings were becoming a sore spot in my relationship with this manager. In fact, their initial “silence as acceptance” posture appeared to be migrating to “passive annoyance.” So before it became “passive aggressive” I went ahead and asked: Are these meetings I’m having with your team making you upset?

A long pause ensued.

After long consideration, the answer was yes. They understood the relational element —even appreciated it —but they felt that their absence was encouraging unhealthy dynamics, like gossip, to exist.

Hearing this feedback affirmed my intuition that something was amiss. Frankly, “gossip” was not the problem that I feared, nor was it a problem in the current meeting structure. The problem I realized was developing, though, was role confusion. For the closer I became to this team, the more willing they would be to come to me when they have an issue. By changing course, and inviting the manager back into the meeting, I could still communicate that I am always accessible, but their first point of contact is always their manager.

The points here are simple:

Have direct conversations with those you lead, and be willing to ask the uncomfortable question of whether what you are doing is upsetting them.

If the answer is yes, and there is merit to that concern, listen to the feedback and change course as necessary.

As I learned, this not only alleviates potential conflict or angst, but also promotes a healthier culture for everyone.

Bonus:  I recently was on the Manufacturing Alliance Podcast – May 19th edition – and it can be heard on iTunes.

Sensing Something? Just Ask. Read More »

rabbit in profile

A Leadership Experiment

Want to be a better leader?

Stop using navigation apps for the next 30 days, and ask for directions. Always ask, even when you think you are sure you know where you are going.

Listen to the advice you are given.

Discern the good advice from the bad advice.

Make a decision on the route you are going to take and begin proceeding to your destination.

If you get lost, and you will occasionally get lost, relax and think. It is okay to ask for more help. In fact, no bonus points are awarded for “doing it on your own.”

Keep going until you reach your destination. Once there, jot a note down about what you learned, and which roads you should avoid in the future.

And then, take some more notes.  What did you learn about yourself and your leadership?

I dare you to try this experiment.

You’ll become a better leader in the process.

A Leadership Experiment Read More »

man sitting on wood pile with bible in his hand

If you are going to hold people accountable…they’d better know how to do what you want them to do.

Sarah and I could hear our two sons playing, laughing, and yelling. The only problem was the time.

It was 6:04 a.m.

They are not supposed to get up until 6:30 a.m.

Leaders confront these kinds of issues, so off to the bedroom I went.

I asked Will – our 6 year old – what time he got up?

No answer.

So as a good leader, I persisted.

Finally, he told me that he awoke sometime around 5 a.m.

I suspected he was the ring leader, but I also knew that Ben – our 4 year old – was no saint either.

So I also asked Ben what time he got up.

“Well,” he said, “I can’t read the clock, so I don’t know.”

Realizing the only clock in Ben’s room is an old iPhone dock with a broken clock, and remembering that Ben is FOUR, it took everything in me to not burst out laughing.

Chuckle aside, this experience is instructive to leadership at work and elsewhere. How often do I hold people accountable for things they currently don’t have the skills to be held accountable for?

Am I, or are we as an organization, training them for those skills? Are our expectations transparent in the first place? Are they easily understood?

Before you dismiss this a kind of problem your organization doesn’t struggle with, I challenge you to think of the last time you implemented a new technology.

How often do you assume that people on your team know how to use the new technology you have implemented? Maybe they haven’t reached out for help, so is it safe to assume that they know what they’re doing?

Not necessarily.

The only way to be sure, is to be sure. In other words, you have to see them use it.

I share this insight because it is a weakness of mine. We, for example, have a beautiful sales app that can be used on iPads for presentations. I automatically assumed that our team would run with it. I asked if there were any questions and hardly anyone spoke up.

A little over a year later, and I rarely see anyone use it besides myself.

I am at fault here because our sales people are good at what they do. It is something that is new, and therefore, I should have spent more time with them on it.

I will going forward.

I hope my insight challenges you on how you can help those on your team.

If you are going to hold people accountable…they’d better know how to do what you want them to do. Read More »